guides
The 7 best video transcript search tools in 2026
The 7 best video transcript search tools in 2026, ranked by what they actually do well. SavedThat, Glasp, Otter, Fireflies, Reduct, Trint, plus DIY Whisper.
SavedThat team10 min read
The 7 best video transcript search tools in 2026, ranked by what they actually do well. SavedThat, Glasp, Otter, Fireflies, Reduct, Trint, plus DIY Whisper.
"Video transcript search tool" is a category that has fragmented into three subcategories, and the wrong tool for your use case will waste both your money and your time. Below: seven tools that actually ship transcript search in 2026, ranked by what they're best at — not by who pays the most for review placement.
We built SavedThat (#1 below, disclosed). The remaining six are competitors. We were honest about when they win.
Before the ranking, this distinction matters because it picks 70% of your decision:
A tool that's #1 in one category is rarely above #4 in the others. Mixing them up is the most common mistake we see.
| # | Tool | Best for | Free tier | Starts at |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SavedThat | Personal video bookmark search across YouTube/IG/TikTok | 7-day trial | $9.99/mo |
| 2 | Otter.ai | Live meeting transcription + search | 300 min/mo | $8.33/mo |
| 3 | Fireflies.ai | Sales-call transcription + CRM hooks | 800 min/mo | $10/mo |
| 4 | Reduct | Video editing by transcript (creators) | Trial | $30/mo |
| 5 | Trint | Enterprise transcription + collaboration | None | $80/mo |
| 6 |
Built around: the moment a week from now when you remember a phrase from a video you saved and need to find it. URL-in, transcript-out, search-by-what-was-said.
How it works: paste any YouTube, Instagram Reel, or TikTok URL. Transcript fetched (free for YouTube via innertube, paid for Reels/TikToks via Supadata). Chunked into ~18-second windows with 5-second overlap. Each chunk embedded with OpenAI's text-embedding-3-small (768-dim via Matryoshka representation). Indexed in Postgres pgvector with HNSW for vectors and GIN tsvector for full-text. Search runs both in parallel and merges via reciprocal rank fusion.
Where it wins:
Where it doesn't fit: not built for live-meeting transcription. If your transcripts come from Zoom recordings, look at Otter (#2) or Fireflies (#3).
Pricing: 7-day free trial (card required), then Pro $9.99/mo (300 saves, 2h video, 100h library). Power $16.99/mo (1500 saves, 5h video, 500h library). 20% off yearly. See pricing.
Disclosure: we built it. Below this point we're recommending competitors honestly.
Built around: the person who joins five Zoom calls a day and wants to search across the transcripts months later. Otter records, transcribes, and indexes meetings in real time.
How it works: Otter joins your meeting (Zoom/Meet/Teams) as a bot, records the audio, transcribes with their proprietary ASR, and stores the transcript in your account. Search is keyword-based across all your meeting transcripts — not semantic, but very fast.
Where it wins:
Where it doesn't fit: Otter does not index YouTube/Instagram/TikTok URLs. Pasting a YouTube link gets you a notification that you should upload an audio file instead. For consumer video bookmarks, it's the wrong category.
Pricing: Free (300 min/mo). Pro $8.33/mo (1,200 min). Business $20/mo (6,000 min). See otter.ai/pricing.
Built around: revenue teams. Fireflies records sales calls, transcribes them, extracts action items, and pushes the data into HubSpot/Salesforce/Pipedrive.
How it works: like Otter, joins meetings as a bot. The differentiator is the post-call automation: AI-summarised notes, auto-tagged action items, sentiment analysis on the prospect's responses, push-to-CRM with deal stages updated.
Where it wins:
Where it doesn't fit: the search experience is meeting-by-meeting; cross-archive semantic search is weaker than Otter Chat. Also a sales tool — pricing and UX optimise for that workflow, not personal saving.
Pricing: Free (800 min/mo). Pro $10/mo. Business $19/mo. See fireflies.ai/pricing.
Built around: the video editor or podcaster who needs to cut a long interview down to a 4-minute social clip. Reduct shows the transcript as the editing surface — delete words and the video deletes the matching segments.
How it works: upload long-form video → Reduct transcribes → you edit by deleting transcript text → export the trimmed video. Search is fast because you're searching the same transcript that drives the cuts.
Where it wins:
Where it doesn't fit: consumer pricing. $30/mo starting and aimed at editing teams. Not a bookmark search tool.
Pricing: Trial (no permanent free tier). Studio $30/mo. Enterprise custom. See reduct.video/pricing.
Built around: newsrooms, large content teams, legal discovery. Trint transcribes uploaded video and audio at high accuracy and adds rigorous collaboration tooling — version history, role-based access, redaction, audit logs.
How it works: upload media → transcribed at very high accuracy (often the best on this list for difficult audio like courtroom recordings, multi-accent meetings, heavy background noise) → search across your team's archive with permission scoping.
Where it wins:
Where it doesn't fit: $80/month entry is steep for individuals, and the workflow assumes "upload a file" rather than "save a URL". Wrong tool for consumer bookmarking.
Pricing: Starter $80/mo. Advanced $100+/mo. Enterprise quote-based. See trint.com/pricing.
Built around: the active YouTube watcher who treats videos as study material. Glasp overlays the YouTube transcript next to the video; you click sentences to highlight. Highlights sync to a private library that's searchable by keyword and exports to Notion/Readwise.
How it works: browser extension shows the transcript live. Click a sentence → highlight saved → searchable. The search is keyword over your highlights, not over the full transcript of every video — you only get back what you marked.
Where it wins:
Where it doesn't fit: YouTube only. No Instagram, TikTok, or meeting support. Search is over highlights, not the full transcript, so passive saves aren't searchable.
Pricing: Free (core workflow). AI features tier exists for summaries. See glasp.co.
Built around: the developer who wants total control and no recurring spend. Run OpenAI Whisper locally to transcribe (or any of its derivatives like Faster-Whisper, WhisperX), store chunks in pgvector on a Postgres instance you control, expose a search endpoint.
How it works: the same architecture every paid tool on this list uses, just with you holding every component. Walked through end-to-end in our make saved videos searchable guide.
Where it wins:
Where it doesn't fit: maintenance burden. Every platform change (YouTube tweaks innertube, Instagram rotates their video URL format) is a ticket. yt-dlp updates routinely fix new platform breakages, but they're your problem to apply. Sharing with others or accessing on mobile means more plumbing.
Pricing: Free in money. Real cost: 10-30 hours of initial setup + ~1 hour/month of maintenance.
Match the category first, then optimise within it:
The honest verdict for most readers landing on a "best video transcript search tool" query in 2026: you're in category 1 (personal video bookmark search). Try SavedThat's 7-day free trial, Glasp's free tier, or both. If you can describe your need as "I save TikToks and YouTube videos and can't find them later," you've already narrowed past 4 of the 7 tools above.
Transcript search indexes the spoken words in a video and matches your query against that text — by keyword, by semantic similarity, or both. AI video search (a broader marketing term) sometimes means transcript search, but can also include visual analysis (object recognition in frames), speaker identification, or summarisation. For most consumer use cases, transcript search delivers 95% of the value because what was said is the highest-information signal a video carries.
Not directly. Otter is built for live meeting transcription, not URL-based video bookmarking. You can manually upload a YouTube video's audio file and have Otter transcribe it, but there's no integration that automates this from a URL. For YouTube-and-friends bookmark search, use SavedThat or Glasp instead.
For difficult audio (heavy accents, multiple overlapping speakers, music in background), Trint and Otter both consistently rank at the top in public benchmarks. For straightforward speech in a major language, Whisper-large (DIY) and Supadata (used by SavedThat) are functionally on par at ~95% word accuracy. The transcription engine matters less than people assume — most usability gains in transcript search come from the search layer (hybrid vs FTS-only) rather than the transcription step.
| Glasp |
| YouTube highlight search (free) |
| Unlimited |
| Free |
| 7 | DIY: Whisper + pgvector | Self-hosted, total control | Free | Compute only |
Only the DIY Whisper option (#7) is fully offline. All six commercial tools require an internet connection because the transcription happens on the vendor's servers. If offline support is critical (legal discovery, classified material, no-network environments), the DIY route is your only path.
Trint (#5) and Whisper-based tools (#1 via Supadata, #7 DIY) have the strongest multilingual coverage — 50+ and 100+ languages respectively. Otter and Fireflies are English-first with paid add-ons for major European and Asian languages. Glasp's UI is English-only but YouTube auto-captions work for any language the video has them in.
For personal bookmarking on consumer plans, $7-17/month covers most workflows (SavedThat Pro or Power). For meeting transcription with a sales team, expect $10-25/user/month (Otter or Fireflies). For production video editing, $30-100/month for Reduct or Trint. Enterprise SOC2-compliant setups run $80/seat and up. The DIY route is free in money but costs 10-30 hours of initial setup time.
Search inside saved videos by what was actually said — across YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok. How transcript search works in 2026, and four tools that do it.
The best AI video bookmark manager in 2026 depends on what you save. Honest comparison of SavedThat, Mymind, Raindrop, and Glasp — pricing, search, platforms.
Make saved YouTube videos searchable in 2026 — three concrete methods, from a 5-min browser trick to a full transcript search tool. Side-by-side comparison.